雷霆卡丁

　　Three journalists in a romantic triangle are involved in political intrigue during the last days of the corrupt Somozoa regime in Nicaragua before it falls to a popular revolution in 1979.

　　在深邃的太空中，一个宇航员回望地球，回忆起自己童年的时光，于是时间回到1946年。哈萨克斯坦的一个小镇上，很多人都喜欢养鸽子。这天，有一只从遥远的地方飞来的白鸽引起众人的目光，万尼亚把这只鸽子抓住了，立即招徕众人的嫉妒和仇恨。后来，鸽子还是被偷走了，万尼亚不忍心让这只白鸽成为灵魂阴暗的人的牺牲品，拼了命也要把鸽子找回来，终于白鸽重新回到了蓝天。

　　斯奈利和达利从小就是性情迥异的死对头，即使是长大后达利变成威风的骑警，斯奈利仍为无恶不赦的大坏蛋，在一次抢劫活动，斯奈利占据了小镇，一切都在乱无法纪的状况下进行，达利要如何解决这混乱的场面让小镇恢复平静？

安娜快30岁了，还和妈妈住在一起。她每天都用她的大拇指做演员来制作视频，但是安娜没有给任何人看这些视频，没有人知道它们是干什么用的。在她生日的前一周，她的妈妈给她下了最后通牒——她必须搬出棚屋，去剪个不影响性别的发型，不要再穿得像个无家可归的青少年。安娜很自然地告诉妈妈“滚开”，笨拙的人际交往能力不断地影响着她的生活......

　　故事紧接着上一集发展，小狗贝多芬和露西终于走到了一起，过上了幸福的生活，露西还为贝多芬生下了四只可爱的小狗，一家人其乐融融。然而，这四只小狗崽却让孩子们陷入了烦恼之中，如果让爸爸知道家里一下子多了这四个小家伙，那还不非得翻了天不可。
　　虽然挨了老爸一顿臭骂，但善良的布鲁诺先生（凯文·杜恩 Kevin Dunn 饰）还是收留了贝多芬和露西的孩子们，一家人前往宁静的小村开始了悠闲的度假。然而他们并不知道的是，布鲁诺的前妻瑞吉娜（黛比·玛扎 Debi Mazar 饰）早已经盯上了小狗崽们，她想将它们偷到手，卖掉大赚一笔。得知此事的贝多芬率先行动，带领妻儿躲到了山中，瑞吉娜紧随其后。

　　15世纪初，俄罗斯动荡时期。著名圣像画家安德烈·卢布廖夫（安纳托里·索洛尼岑 Anatoli Solonitsyn饰）在大公的邀请下前往莫斯科为教堂作画，受到了贵族式的服务与对待。然而，卢布廖夫却身处在一个饱受鞑靼人铁蹄践踏和充满灾难残杀的悲惨时代。目睹了黎民百姓在大公暴政下的水深火热，卢布廖夫毅然离开教堂返回修道院。不久，卢布廖夫被迫再度回到莫斯科进行圣像创作。然而面对居民被无辜的残杀，教堂在战火中被无情的摧毁，卢布廖夫再次陷入艺术与现实巨大反差的质疑之中，拒绝继续作画。1423年，鞑靼人的军队终于被赶出俄罗斯的大地。在经历了炮火、鲜血的锤炼洗礼后的卢布廖夫，终于完成了传世名作《三位一体》的创作。
　　由苏联电影大师安德烈·塔科夫斯基执导的旷世史诗巨作《安德烈·卢布廖夫》，用塔式特有的诗化电影语言和如历史壁画一般的浓重画笔，呈现了15世纪俄罗斯著名圣像画家安德烈·卢布廖夫漂泊与抉择的一生。本片荣获1969年第22届戛纳电影节费比西奖。

　　城市里突然出现一种传染性极高的疾病。由科学家，生物学家，物理学家组成的科学救援组立即采取行动。他们要与时间赛跑，必须阻止这些病菌继续感染其他市民，危害市民的安全。
　　病情越发严重，患者的症状也各不相同，西尼罗河热，寄生虫，以及肺结核的症状均有发生。萨拉·伯格曼博士深入疾病爆发地。救援组又遇到一个新的问题，全城范围的脑膜炎似乎要爆发了，而在此关键时刻，一名银行抢劫犯挟持了六名人质包括伯格曼博士及她的得力助手。事情到底会如何发展呢？

　　《巨大》讲的是一个被背叛的母亲和她迫切想要变成男孩的女儿之间的故事。该片故事背景设定在上世纪70年的罗马，意大利社会正处于转折点，影片描绘了一个家庭的生活点滴。佩内洛普饰演克拉拉，是一位母亲，是整个故事的核心。她的女儿执着想变成一个男孩，以及她和另一个身份差距悬殊的女孩之间懵懂的初恋。

　　管道工接到报告说某个住满底层群众的筒子楼水管崩裂，去勘察时发现大楼豆腐渣工程即将在24小时内倒塌，于是通过母亲好友联系到女镇长，女镇长和手下考虑了自身利益，又经扶植女镇长上位的经济操手怂恿，大家决定放弃转移大楼中的820名住客并暗中杀害了两个头头当做替罪羊。
　　其中被杀的 负责建筑的头临死替管道工求了情，允许他闭嘴带着家人远走他乡，管道工心中良心未死，不听父母及妻子的劝告执意去救人……

　　1984年，奥登夫妇的六岁儿子罗伦佐患上罕见的ALD(肾上腺白质退化)症，这是医生宣布为无药可治的绝症。但奥登夫妇均不肯放弃希望，以各种方法挑战医学界的不足，并发明了一种特殊配方的油给罗伦佐食用，终于从死亡边缘把他给救了回来，并且造福了其它同患此病症的患病家属。

　　A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
　　Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle&♯39;s red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
　　This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar&♯39;s interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle&♯39;s conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
　　One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
　　- JohnHowardReid, imdb