韩国男人在巴黎

　　故事发生在十七世纪的波兰。书亚（Mieczyslaw Voit 饰）是一名德高望重的神父，坚定的坚持着自己对主的信仰和理想。某一日，他被派往了一间修道院中工作，有传闻魔鬼偷偷潜入了这间修道院，在其中作祟。
　　修道院的院长是一个名为乔安（卢茜娜·温尼斯卡 Lucyna Winnicka 饰）的女人，这个女人的身上散发出一股强大而又神秘的美丽，让众多的修女们为之疯狂。随着时间的推移，神父书亚发现魔鬼的力量实在是过去强大，仅凭他一人之力无法驾驭，于是向一个老法师寻求帮助。然而，最终，书亚亦没有能够拒绝魔鬼的诱惑，为了帮助乔安，他甚至犯下了杀人的罪孽。

　　寅次郎回来通知家人，打算跟他途中相识的单亲妈妈娟代订婚。当娟代失踪已久的丈夫再次出现后，寅次郎留下短信就离开了。在旅途中，寅次郎在津和野重遇旧相识歌子，而她的丈夫刚病逝。基于责任，她与夫家苛刻的父母一起生活。寅次郎劝说歌子来东京，并陪同她去见因反对婚事而对歌子疏远的作家父亲。寅次郎希望与歌子有所发展的意图落空，因歌子决定要奉献她的生命给弱智儿童。

　　Mitya and Alisa are set to get married. The problem is that Mitya is still married to Vasya, who refuses to grant him a divorce. Can Mitya and his friends convince Vasya to change her mind?

 暴风雨中，3名女子学校的学生被困在地下坑里，他们必须直面各自的内心冲突，奋力求生。

　　一群大学生在四月一日愚人节结伴到一无人荒岛的巨宅中度周末，结果碰上血腥的愚人节恶作剧。他们在互相玩笑之余却逐一被杀，而邀请他们前来的富家女莫菲圣琼却始终未露面，这到底是什么回事？影片明显地采用了艾嘉莎克莉丝蒂的侦探名著《十个小印第安人》的故事模式，让剧中人一个一个被杀

　　【收录话】
　　「もののけの息」主演：喜多岛舞 监督：三宅隆太
　　「御祓いは效かない」主演：橘実里、小林宏史 监督：佐々木浩久
　　「毛浪」主演：辻美里、井上优里菜 监督：荒川荣二
　　「残业1」主演：いとうまい子、堀江庆 监督：平野俊一
　　「残业2」主演：いとうまい子、堀江庆 监督：平野俊一
　　「黑い男たち」主演：石坂良磨、坂寄卓士 监督：豊岛圭介
　　「幽灵屋敷と呼ばれる家」主演：堀北真希 监督：佐々木浩久
　　「教えて」主演：佐藤康惠、末吉宏司 监督：豊岛圭介

　　吉他手埃尔（安东尼奥•班德拉斯 Antonio Banderas 饰）靠在夜总会表演为生。一天，他的女友遭到了当地的一个大毒枭的枪杀，而埃尔的左手也遭到枪击，从此不能再弹吉他了。于是，埃尔的吉他盒子里放的不再是吉他，而是武器装备。他带着他的吉他盒子穿过一个又一个街头，为的是为女友报仇雪恨。大毒枭得知埃尔正在寻仇，于是派出手下前来暗杀他。危难关头，埃尔幸得美女卡罗琳娜（萨尔玛•海耶克 Salma Hayek 饰）相救。大难不死，更加坚定了埃尔报仇的决心。

　　深受国际影坛瞩目的葡萄牙导演米格尔戈麦斯，继享誉国际的《金色八月天》、《禁恋》后，以长达383分钟的新作《一千零一夜》三部曲，呈现当代葡萄牙的众生相。首部曲《一千零一夜I：不安之人》以天方夜谭中诉说故事的皇后雪哈拉莎德展开，藉由三段故事描绘富人、穷人、强者、鲁蛇、小偷和诚实的人，如何在金融风暴下存活下来。米格尔戈麦斯结合现实主义色彩与冷调幽默的讽刺笔触，犀利批判政府的财政计画，令人大呼精彩。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　19世纪的英国，阶级隔阂还十分分明。这天，英国上层出身的露西（海伦娜•邦汉•卡特 Helena Bonham Carter 饰）和表姐夏洛特一起佛罗伦撒度假，不巧，露西住的酒店的房间看不到风景。同时来住店的英国父子两乔治（朱利安•桑兹 Julian Sands 饰）和他父亲见状，热心的父亲要和露西换一间房，因为他的房里能看到风景。露西开始不同意，在好心的店主的劝说下最终她同意了。
　　乔治和露西很快堕入了爱河，然而下等阶层出身的乔治身上有着很多露西看不惯的“陋习”，夏洛特也不甚喜欢乔治，双方在交往中闹了不少“笑话”。一次，乔治“越轨”吻了露西一下，露西认为乔治太过“不合礼仪”，于是独自回了英国。
　　乔治很快也回了国，然而，这时露西已经订了婚……

　　女儿艾玛（德博拉•温格 Debra Winger 饰）是妈妈奥罗拉（雪莉•麦克雷恩 Shirley MacLaine 饰）的心肝宝贝，自小开始，奥罗拉就帮艾玛安排好一切，艾玛的言谈举止、修饰打扮、学习、玩耍、交朋友等等都必须经过奥罗拉同意。
　　在丈夫早逝后，奥罗拉操持起家里的一切，对艾玛更加“专制”。艾玛虽然表明很温柔、软弱，但是内心却十分倔强。两母女也因此多次吵架。奥罗拉一直没再接受其他男人的追求，艾玛也在和母亲相依相偎、磕磕绊绊中长大。
　　长大后的艾玛开始极力摆脱母亲的“专制”：她不顾母亲的反对，嫁给了一个工作不稳定的研究生……她花了三十年去摆脱母亲的“专制”，到头来却发现自己对母亲的始终不忘的依依亲情。

　　Since 1977, Sam Klemke has been recording himself on film, the ♯selfieavantlalettre. In that same year, NASA launched the Voyager with the Golden Record. Whereas NASA primarily sketches a positive picture of humanity, Klemke&♯39;s honest self portraits zoom in on the individual. A special film about time, memory and what it means to be human.
　　‘This year will be my year, it has to be!’ Since 1977, Sam Klemke - a pioneer status updater - has looked back on ‘his year’ using video. With the illusion of progress, he hopes to encourage ‘personal growth and improvement’.
　　Documentary maker Matthew Bate met Klemke on Facebook and became acquainted with his video 35 Years Back Through Time, a super-cut in which Klemke counts backwards from 2011 to his ambitious teenage self. Intrigued by this obsessive film project, Bate used Klemke&♯39;s personal archive to create a documentary collage that feels like an intimate road trip, with Klemke providing valuable lessons about time. Along the way, he dismantles the dream of success and happiness. Klemke&♯39;s self-mockery and honesty give the whole thing a light, breezy feel.
　　Through this, Bate interweaves NASA’s Golden Record Project which, just like Klemke’s video project, was launched in 1977. This juxtaposition creates a reflection in which Bate sketches the comprehension of time and self-documenting stories as an inherent human need.