Way beyond Cocteau and Disney, this decidedly queer and sexually explicit version of the timeless fairytale La belle et la bête finds a twink Beauty in the candle-lit dungeon of a kink Beast.
佐藤良人（片冈直人 饰）的父亲在早年间去世了，留下良人和母亲安江（凉 饰）过着相依为命的生活。安江靠着经营烤肉店根岸苑养活良人，这家店也是她的丈夫给她留下的唯一一样财产。安江的烹饪手艺很好，根岸苑被她经营得井井有条，门庭若市，对于安江来说，能够一边制作美味的料理，一边看着儿子健康的长大，是她最快乐的事情。 然而，一切都在人气美食评论家古山（松尾谕 饰）对根岸苑发起了毫无根据的攻击之后改变了，店里的人气逐渐低迷，而良人也希望一直忙碌的母亲能够将更多的心思放在自己身上，于是，不久之后，根岸苑宣布闭店。
2017年に初演された同名舞台を映画化した本作。親友を亡くした引っ込み思案の女子高生・穴森一穂が1通の手紙を受け取り、謎の転校生が待つ夜の校舎へと向かうさまが描かれる。
Baby Let’s Do It
面对岁月挑战的老猎手，和自己收养的狐狸一起，彼此都成全了彼此的追逐。没有任何一部描写人与动物关系的影片具有如此的震撼力。
谢利亚，一个单身母亲，有时是超自然调查员，被征召去调查在东田纳西州一个寡妇的农舍里可能"闹鬼"的问题。
根据鲁茂·戈登的原作改编，让·雷诺阿的首部彩色长片，是他和他的侄子摄影师在印度境内拍摄的影片，也是让·雷诺阿的一次感官与视觉之旅。 故事围绕三个年轻女孩的成长忧伤出发，让·雷诺阿以细致的笔触叙述古老孟加拉河流域的传奇故事。影片直接启发了一代印度大师萨蒂亚吉特·雷伊投入电影创作。
B级片，一个外科医生搞砸了对一个年轻人的手术，年轻人的女朋友伤心欲绝，就将男医生胁迫到自己的公寓，进行欺辱....
戴安娜，紐約股票交易所的高級培訓生；瑟林姆，阿拉伯大亨；戴安娜遭到綁架到瑟林姆設置于北非沙漠，景致秀麗的隱蔽堡壘中，有趣的是，他們的角色互換了起來，戴安娜并不介意與這個迷人的男子同床共枕，誰知瑟林姆的后宮純粹只是用以裝點門面，他對性關係并沒有戴安娜那么隨便。事實上瑟林姆并非是壞人，他綁架戴安娜，完全是爲了一個自己也不信仰的歷史傳統的堅持，他是個完美主義者，一心要融入西方世界......
Gabrielle is writing an illustrated guide book on sex called &♯39;How To Do It.&♯39; At a book signing she meets Saul, an established male writer who is straight. She both loves and hates his work which has seeped into her secular Jewish life from childhood. The more Gabrielle tells him about her book the more he wants to know about her life; the relationship with her younger girlfriend Olivia and her determination to "stop using my penis in sex". As her book takes form, is Saul jealous or desirous? Their friendship is tested as is Gabrielle&♯39;s relationship with Olivia. The film muses on how we write, how we draw. And the nature of "story" and what it makes us do.
某五年制高专学校，可爱女孩叶泽里美（长泽雅美 饰）连续一个月旷课，还在制作的机器人上涂鸦。为避免暑期留校补习，她只得遵从机器人部的顾问图师隼人（铃木一真 饰）的安排加入机器人制作组，备战即将到来的机器人竞赛（Robo-Con）。里美所在的小组由天才机器人设计师相田航一（小栗旬 饰）和热情开朗的作战指挥四谷四郎（伊藤淳史 饰）组成，对于这个对机械没有丁点概念的女孩来说，一切都如此陌生，她只得从最简单的机器人操作做起。 不久，超过60所高专参加的机器人竞赛来开序幕。未经充分磨合的小组、设计不够完善的作品，里美难忘的夏天就这样开始了……
Sin Sisters
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"? The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
