肩外的恋人

　　After the murder of her two Scandinavian friends in Morocco, A Russian blogger decides to do her own justice.

　　一位外星科学家和他的团队被派往地球，从他们垂死的星球上通过释放吸血鬼、狼人和木乃伊等怪物来消灭人类，以便继承地球。

　　宾果（Bingo）是一条其貌不扬的狗，自从它勇救落水男孩查克（Robert J. Steinmiller Jr.饰），就和辛迪成为了要好的朋友。可是，辛迪的家人并不能容纳它，在举家搬迁时把它留在了旧屋。宾果一心要找回它忠诚守护的小主人，于是上演了一个千里寻人的故事。
　　宾果的路上充满了坎坷的困难，同时充满了新鲜的挑战。它救出被抢劫的一家，被误投进监狱，而后开始了宾果版的“越狱”大戏，终于回到查克身边，却发现查克似乎已经把它忘记。宾果和主人的感情，看来还要经受一次劫难的洗礼才能得到明证。

　　威尔（本·福斯特 Ben Foster 饰）和女儿汤姆（托马辛·麦肯齐 Thomasin McKenzie 饰）过着相依为命的日子。父女两人在深山老林里安营扎寨，一直都离群索居，不和现代社会有所接触。虽然丛林里的生存条件十分的恶劣，但威尔觉得这才是他们应该有的生活。
　　某日，政府的工作人员找到了父女两人，强制将他们带回了文明世界之中，虽然在这里吃得饱、穿得暖，但威尔还是觉得自己仿佛在坐牢一般。终于，他决定带着汤姆再度回到他的野生王国之中，可此时的汤姆显然更加愿意待在无论做什么事情都非常便利的城市里，父女两人之间产生了巨大的分歧。在自己的意愿和女儿的渴望之间，威尔会如何选择呢？

　　卡露与丈夫荣一直生活沉闷，欠缺新意。直至一日，她工作的老人院来了一位新房客──大盗亨利，卡露负责照顾他的起居，并开始怀疑他是诈傻扮懵。于是便用种种方法迫亨利现形，最后她终于得偿所愿，更与亨利一起做案，这次前所未有的刺激改写了她以后的人生……

　　根据鲁茂·戈登的原作改编，让·雷诺阿的首部彩色长片，是他和他的侄子摄影师在印度境内拍摄的影片，也是让·雷诺阿的一次感官与视觉之旅。
　　故事围绕三个年轻女孩的成长忧伤出发，让·雷诺阿以细致的笔触叙述古老孟加拉河流域的传奇故事。影片直接启发了一代印度大师萨蒂亚吉特·雷伊投入电影创作。

　　出生于韩国的弗雷迪，自少便被领养家庭带到法国生活。25岁那年原本要去东京旅行，却因遇上台风而转游首尔，继而开展了一段寻根之旅。在法国成长的她，与亲生父母有着全然不同的文化，使这趟突如其来的旅程引发出更深层的身份思考，也将她的人生引领至始料未及的方向。

4000年前，埃及艳后与大将军坦图斯之间擦出了违禁的情欲火花。处刑时两人的惨叫声中却有一丝安慰，因为忠仆泰塔已把他们的孩子放进尼罗河里，祈求河神大灵蛇的佑护。4000年后，年轻的考古学家罗兰和她的丈夫杜瑞德在尼罗河畔捡到一个孩子，为他取名作哈比。命运指引他们走入埃及马西莫时期奴隶泰塔的坟墓，并在墓中发现了七个卷轴，上面记载了上古埃及宫廷内发生的一切，但记载着拥有大量宝藏的法老墓地址的卷轴已经成了碎片，两人决心复原第七个卷轴。但即将成功之时，文物大盗席勒抢走了卷轴，并且杀死杜...

　　墨西哥城高檔酒店內，年輕女傭自有心事。日復一日的漫長工作，總有打掃不盡的房間。她長途跋涉上班，無法照料年幼兒子，卻要幫客人看顧小孩。參加進修班，望能晉升到尊貴樓層。偶然拾獲紅裙，盼失物無人認領可據為己有。抹窗工人隔窗傳情，她其實更需要找到女性自我的聲音。來自劇場的阿維萊絲首拍長片即備受注目，以紀實眼光看打工女的生活與生存，發掘角色沉靜外表下的豐富情感，暗暗接通戴丹兄弟和艾方素卡朗的《羅馬》（2018）。

　　十二岁的杰米本杰明是一个被人误解的孩子。 他的同学歧视他，他的邻居认为他很奇怪，而他的父母也嘲笑他。 但现在杰米有了一个秘密武器：他在森林深处发现了一个深深的坑，里面居住着他称之为穴居人的食人生物......而且不久之后他开始了一系列疯狂之举......

　　上集中异形并没有被消灭掉，她又回来了，变得更加的强大，这次的主角轮到别克的女儿朱丽娅了，她和另一个伙伴要继续面对新的挑战了

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.