联谊会姐妹

　　古美术鉴定家剑持（中村鴈治郎 饰）终于迎来自己的老年时代，他的身体各项技能都开始退化，然而其又心存不甘。剑持的妻子郁子（京マチ子 饰）端庄贤淑，出身僧侣之家且受着传统教育的她即使在夫妻云雨之时也拒绝欲望的宣泄。深知妻子隐含的欲望，剑持一方面想引导郁子变成一个放荡的女人，一方面也希望通过嫉妒来让自己重新焕发活力。他经常将年轻英俊的医学院学生木村（仲代達矢 饰）邀至家中，企图从木村和郁子的暧昧中感受强烈的嫉妒。同时他将真实想法写在日记里，并设法让郁子看到。夫妻二人由此展开危险、致命的欲望游戏……
　　本片根据日本官能作家谷崎润一郎的同名原作改编，并荣获1960年戛纳电影节评委会奖、1960年蓝丝带最佳导演奖、1960年美国金球奖最佳外语片奖、1960年电影旬报最佳剧本奖。

　　Antoine was raised into the easy life by his very rich grandfather. After the death of his grandfather the money has gone and Antoine falls under the influence of various easy people.

　　墨西哥城高檔酒店內，年輕女傭自有心事。日復一日的漫長工作，總有打掃不盡的房間。她長途跋涉上班，無法照料年幼兒子，卻要幫客人看顧小孩。參加進修班，望能晉升到尊貴樓層。偶然拾獲紅裙，盼失物無人認領可據為己有。抹窗工人隔窗傳情，她其實更需要找到女性自我的聲音。來自劇場的阿維萊絲首拍長片即備受注目，以紀實眼光看打工女的生活與生存，發掘角色沉靜外表下的豐富情感，暗暗接通戴丹兄弟和艾方素卡朗的《羅馬》（2018）。

　　戴茜（杰西卡·坦尼Jessica Tandy 饰）小时候在贫民地方长大，丈夫生意的崛起才让他们家过上富足日子，所以戴茜非常节俭。现在她年事已高，不能自己开车了，儿子为她请来黑人司机霍克（摩根·弗里曼 Morgan Freeman饰），但是戴茜却十分不喜欢。她起初逃避出行 ，因为不想让霍克当上司机，后来她才觉得，儿子付了钱却不用他干活，似乎太不划算，于是终于给了霍克第一次为自己开车的机会。
　　霍克是一个非常善良淳朴的男人，他知道自己不被接受，并没有把不快放在心里。相反地，他处处关心戴茜的生活，也慢慢了解戴茜坚守原则的执著性格。戴茜对霍克的排斥开始慢慢消融，直至几年间她终于发现，霍克是一个很值得信赖的朋友。
　　于是，戴茜教会不识字的霍克传授认字，霍克也成为了戴茜晚年最贴心的朋友。

　　内战连绵多年之后，一名尼泊尔共产党员终于收拾行囊，带著路上巧遇的孤儿返回偏远家乡，好为甫逝世的父亲奔丧。他的亲兄弟在内战中投入了敌对阵营，水火不容的两人只好约定暂时休战；妻子则生下了其他男人的女儿，小女孩却以为他才是自己的亲生父亲。在抬着遗体下山火葬的这趟险峻路程中，隐忍已久的对立衝突终于全面爆发。
　　导演将延烧十年的尼泊尔内战巧妙纳入一场葬礼之中，在这座偏远山村裡，男尊女卑与种姓制度仍然根深柢固；来自外界的男主角儘管曾为现代普世价值而战，但为了替亡父完成葬礼，却不得不屈从于信奉古老习俗的村中耆老。现代与传统、宗教与世俗，甚至家庭与亲情、战争与和平，终将在这一面飘扬著白日的尼泊尔国旗之下疗伤癒合。

　　15世纪初，俄罗斯动荡时期。著名圣像画家安德烈·卢布廖夫（安纳托里·索洛尼岑 Anatoli Solonitsyn饰）在大公的邀请下前往莫斯科为教堂作画，受到了贵族式的服务与对待。然而，卢布廖夫却身处在一个饱受鞑靼人铁蹄践踏和充满灾难残杀的悲惨时代。目睹了黎民百姓在大公暴政下的水深火热，卢布廖夫毅然离开教堂返回修道院。不久，卢布廖夫被迫再度回到莫斯科进行圣像创作。然而面对居民被无辜的残杀，教堂在战火中被无情的摧毁，卢布廖夫再次陷入艺术与现实巨大反差的质疑之中，拒绝继续作画。1423年，鞑靼人的军队终于被赶出俄罗斯的大地。在经历了炮火、鲜血的锤炼洗礼后的卢布廖夫，终于完成了传世名作《三位一体》的创作。
　　由苏联电影大师安德烈·塔科夫斯基执导的旷世史诗巨作《安德烈·卢布廖夫》，用塔式特有的诗化电影语言和如历史壁画一般的浓重画笔，呈现了15世纪俄罗斯著名圣像画家安德烈·卢布廖夫漂泊与抉择的一生。本片荣获1969年第22届戛纳电影节费比西奖。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　"Run Fast Or Fly High" brings back slapstick comedy to the 21st Century. Fasten your seat belts.

　　A female cop is gunned down and wrongly accused of using excessive force in a hostage rescue attempt. Maniac cop returns from the dead once more to seek revenge, destroying everthing and anyone that stands in his way.

　　Married carnival performers are subjected to the abuses of their employer in this silent film gem that has not received as much attention as it deserves. When the boss&♯39; unwanted advances on the wife are refused, he taunts a lion until it nearly kills her. But the other performers assist in a unique plot for revenge. Jaque Catelain directs and stars in this film made for influential French director Marcel L&♯39;Herbier&♯39;s production company. Some sources also list L&♯39;Herbier as co-director, as he is credited here. The film boasts some rapid-fire editing techniques that were decades ahead of its time.

　　20世纪30年代，东京银座。咖啡馆女招待岛杉子（忍節子 饰）和中根袈裟子（香取千代子 饰）是一对亲密无间的好朋友。杉子与原田（結城一朗 饰）相恋多时，已经到了谈婚论嫁的地步。某天，杉子无意中被一辆轿车碰倒，也由此结识了轿车的主人——富家子弟山内弘（山内光 饰）。这平平凡凡的遭遇，却让原田心生误会，继而选择分手。另一方面，山内则为温柔可人的杉子所倾倒，情愿与定亲的女友分开，但是这对不同阶层的人儿必须面对重重的阻力。袈裟子厌烦了女招待的工作，适逢某女明星引退，在星探的鼓动下，袈裟子展开了全新的人生……
　　本片根据北村小松的小说改编。

　　【幕后制作】
　　拍摄动机起于一九五四年轰动一时的近江绢系公司的女工罢工事件。不过电影则改以大学女生抗争学校不合理的束缚为主线。京都的正伦女子大学是一所思想保守，培育学生成为贤妻良母的大学，对于学生的私生活予以严历的管束，与男学生交往者一律以退学为惩。其中泷冈富子是位外向奔放的女孩因与男生交往而受到退学的处分，村野明子是学校经费捐赠人之女，却站在与家庭相反的立埸，在学校发表左翼的激动言论，煽动学生响应反封建运动，由于明子的做法过于激进终遭失败，最后由于出石芳江之死终于引了学生群起抗议的高潮， 藉此争论。导演木下惠介也表达了左翼学生往往陷入人性弱点无法自拔的观点。本片曾可说是十几年后全球性学生运动的预言作品。而由某些角度看一九六O年前后，大岛渚导演的新左翼激进作品中也可见本片的影响。本片除了描述对封建教育的憎恶，反映社会问题外，抒情场面也优美突出。