30正美丽

　　Wes Block is a detective who&♯39;s put on the case of a serial killer whose victims are young and pretty women, that he rapes and murders. The killings are getting personal when the killer chooses victims who are acquaintances of Block. Even his daughters are threatened.

　　故事发生在十七世纪的波兰。书亚（Mieczyslaw Voit 饰）是一名德高望重的神父，坚定的坚持着自己对主的信仰和理想。某一日，他被派往了一间修道院中工作，有传闻魔鬼偷偷潜入了这间修道院，在其中作祟。
　　修道院的院长是一个名为乔安（卢茜娜·温尼斯卡 Lucyna Winnicka 饰）的女人，这个女人的身上散发出一股强大而又神秘的美丽，让众多的修女们为之疯狂。随着时间的推移，神父书亚发现魔鬼的力量实在是过去强大，仅凭他一人之力无法驾驭，于是向一个老法师寻求帮助。然而，最终，书亚亦没有能够拒绝魔鬼的诱惑，为了帮助乔安，他甚至犯下了杀人的罪孽。

　　德国移民的名导演埃里克．冯．施特罗海姆花费了一百三十万美元和十一个月的时间摄制而成的超级文艺片，原拷贝长达五小时，公开上映时浓缩成三小时半。由于耗资惊人，好莱坞大亨本来对埃里克颇有微词，后因本片获得意外的卖座成功而作罢。故事以1919年的蒙地卡罗为背景。埃里克扮演一个欺骗美国外交官女儿的白俄亲王，靠着剥削他的情妇----一个貌丑的女仆为生。由于性虐待狂的驱使，他强奸了一个不幸的白痴女子。最后，他被人杀死，他的尸首很有象征意义地被扔在臭水沟里。埃里克对自然主义情有独钟，希望把一切情史都在画面中表现出来。他特地在加州海边搭建起蒙地卡罗的赌场和雄伟宫殿的布景，并且在采光上有十分大胆的处理方式。影像上也富于感官刺激的煽情暴力场面，甚至劳烦电检单位剪掉了其中的一些镜头。在片中，埃里克用一种辛酸的悲观主义眼光来观察人类，对上层社会的腐朽和封建作出激烈的抨击，流露出一种愤而感伤的怜悯色彩。而对低下层的人物和被骗上当的女子，则寄予同情的关注，表现出独特的“埃里克式人道主义精神"。

　　金哈克曼饰杰森罗德上校，一心追查其在越南战场上失踪的儿子，他数度向美国政府陈情始终石沉大海，罗德绝望之余只好采取自力行动。罗德的苦衷获得德州油亨的资助，召集其子在陆战队服役时五位军中好友，经过数周艰苦的训练之后，七人毅然前往寮国展开一场惊险的营救行动。

　　戴安娜，紐約股票交易所的高級培訓生；瑟林姆，阿拉伯大亨；戴安娜遭到綁架到瑟林姆設置于北非沙漠，景致秀麗的隱蔽堡壘中，有趣的是，他們的角色互換了起來，戴安娜并不介意與這個迷人的男子同床共枕，誰知瑟林姆的后宮純粹只是用以裝點門面，他對性關係并沒有戴安娜那么隨便。事實上瑟林姆并非是壞人，他綁架戴安娜，完全是爲了一個自己也不信仰的歷史傳統的堅持，他是個完美主義者，一心要融入西方世界......

　　Defying the moral constraints of Victorian England and her parents, a young woman engages in unbridled promiscuity with two partners before setting out to capture the fuller sensuality of life itself. Based on the 1915 novel by D.H. Lawrence.

　　Powerful contemporary drama. A young woman falls in love with the wrong man, with tragic consequences for everyone.

　　如小熊从冬眠中醒来，我已开始爱上这样的一个你。」在图书馆里，Hyun Choi (Bae Du Na)发现书中留下这样的一句话，再看另一本书，也是冩著同一句话。到底是谁留下的字？不知不觉间，这句话已扣著Hyun Choi的心弦，她要找出那个静静留低这些话的人…… Hyun Choi是普通朝九晚五办公室上班一族，过去经常因为性格太倔强，多次遭男友们抛弃。当她决定要找出那个神秘留话人的时候，原来真正的爱情已在那一刻发生。 Yong Lee首次执导之作《Do you like spring bear?》，由Bae Du-na及前身为模特儿的Kim Nam-jin主演，清新演绎一段神秘浪漫的现代爱情。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　Buster Keaton&♯39;s final silent feature, as well as the final film in which MGM allowed him any creative control.

　　爱丽丝（朱丽安·摩尔 Julianne Moore 饰）是一位事业有成的大学语言学教授，和丈夫约翰（亚历克·鲍德温 Alec Baldwin 饰）结婚多年，感情一直十分要好，两人生养了三个孩子莉迪亚（克里斯汀·斯图尔特 Kristen Stewart 饰）、斐格利亚（凯 特·波茨沃斯 Kate Bosworth 饰）和汤姆（亨特·帕瑞施 Hunter Parrish 饰），每一个孩子都健康长大。
　　五十岁那年，爱丽丝遭遇了生命中最大的变故，起初，她只是发现自己的记忆力有些退化，随着时间的推移，这种退化越来越严重，经过医生的诊断，她患上了阿尔兹海默病。丰沛的感情，珍贵的记忆，睿智的思想，爱丽丝渐渐的失去了生命中重要的一切，然而，在家人的陪伴和鼓励下，她并没有失去活下去的希望，勇敢而又坚强的迎接新的一天。

　　《男人之苦》第14集，寅次郎（渥美清飾）未婚產子？背著BB回到了東京柴又老家？正當大家決定替寅把寶寶撫養成人之際，才得知這是寅在路上拾回來的棄嬰！寅不是生父，也當然不盡父職，終日百無聊賴，寶寶的事全拜託嬸嬸和妹妹阿櫻……直至美女護士京子（十朱幸代飾）的出現，他才積極表現父愛，還打算參加京子的工餘合唱團，以親近對方。誰知寅就在這兒遇上情敵！那滿面鬍鬚的窮光蛋指揮，原來才是京子的最愛！
　　The fourteenth instalment in the Tora-san series. Tora-san has an illegitimate child? To everyone is surprise, he brought a child back to Shibamata. When everyone in his family decides to raise the child as a family member, they find that he was only an abandoned child that Tora-san found on the street! At first, Tora-san has no interest in taking care of the child and he lets his auntie and sister, Sakura, to do the job instead... until he meets the beautiful nurse Kyoko (Toake Yukiyo). He tries all the ways he could, including taking good care of the child, in order to get her attention. However, a bearded poor conductor in Kyoko is choir stands in the way.