革命之路

　　新牧师拒绝为自杀的艾默尔举办葬礼，这一举动引起了艾默尔的家人的不满，家人将他的遗体埋在了教堂附近。新牧师知道后勃然大怒，拒绝参加村民的任何活动。

　　故事发生在风景如画的意大利西西里，乔（塞吉·卡斯特里图 Sergio Castellitto 饰）带着一部老旧的摄影机和一堆陈旧的底片，自称是一名星探，正在举行一场名叫“影坛新秀”的视镜活动。他声称，如果能被他选上，就有可能一夜成名，成为日进斗金的超级大明星。
　　在闭塞的小镇里，乔的到来在居民中间掀起了一股小小的骚动，全镇上下，男女老少们都十分喜欢这位来自大城市的“时髦先生”，只是，他们并不知道，乔的真实身份是一个满口胡言不折不扣的骗子。随着时间的推移，居民们的真诚和善意逐渐感化了乔，之后，乔又与一位名叫碧雅（蒂兹亚娜·罗达托 Tiziana Lodato 饰）的美丽女子一见钟情，这令过惯了颠沛流离的生活的乔第一次产生了想要停留的想法。

　　Three journalists in a romantic triangle are involved in political intrigue during the last days of the corrupt Somozoa regime in Nicaragua before it falls to a popular revolution in 1979.

　　谢利亚，一个单身母亲，有时是超自然调查员，被征召去调查在东田纳西州一个寡妇的农舍里可能"闹鬼"的问题。

　　日本土耳其合作电影《海难1890》
　　该片根据真人真事改编，故事发生在1890年9月的日本和歌山县串本町大岛的附近海域，来自土耳其的大使团乘坐的军舰发生沉船事故，船上618人跌入大海，导致五百多人丧生，共有69名幸存者在当地民众的营救下脱险。这一沉船救人事件，至今印刻在土耳其人民的心中。

　　妮琪塔（安妮·帕里洛德饰）与一群朋友抢劫一家商店的药品，商店的主人与她的朋友都在这次的事件中身亡，妮琪塔则是因为杀了一位警察而被送入狱。此时来了一个神秘的政府组织，选上了妮琪塔，并训练她成为特务杀手，在经过数年的特务训练之后，妮琪塔以一个平凡的护士身份回到现实的生活中，在此时她爱上了一个男人，他们的关系在妮琪塔接到一个特务命令时，面临了紧张的局面...

　　朝鲜海军一等兵林东海（孔炯珍 饰）不安于单调的军营生活，时常借小聪明享受人生，为此被舰长崔白头（郑俊浩 饰）责罚。崔舰长古板认真，但也会凭官阶优势扮傲慢。是日崔白头携甲板长令林东海划小船去海上消闲，岂料被暴风雨卷走，崔、林二人漂流到了韩国……
　　在美女如云、恍若天堂的韩国沙滩上，崔白头很快确立这次在韩作战目标为返回北方，但林东海更为关注的是用胆大妄为的方式解决衣食等基本需求，并把长官也拉下了水。同时在这片沙滩上，受命寻找私自离家旅游的署长千金韩娜拉（柳贤静 饰）的两位警员也寻至此处。崔、林机缘巧合结识娜拉，于是在回归祖国的大计划引领下，朝鲜海军与美女、警员开始了一段癫狂、浪漫又不乏粗鄙的旅程。

　　罗塞塔（瓦伦蒂娜•斯卡里希 Valentina Scalici 饰）和卢恰诺（朱塞佩•伊拉西塔诺 Giuseppe Ieracitano 饰）是一对相依为命的姐弟，她们的母亲因为逼女儿卖淫而锒铛入狱。此事遭媒体曝光后，两人随后被两个警察送上了去孤儿院的列车。其中一个警察因事先行告退，将姐弟俩托付给警察安东尼奥（恩里克•洛维索 Enrico Lo Verso 饰）独自看护。姐姐背负着雏妓的心理压力，但是弟弟却总是我行我素，两人常常发生争执。安东尼奥总是默默旁观，小心翼翼地呵护着两颗稚嫩的童心。在经历了抢劫、酒店驱逐，学校开除、哮喘疾病等一连串霉运后，安东尼奥似乎跟姐弟俩建立一种亦父亦友的关系，然而一张报纸却让他们的世界陷入崩溃的边缘……
　　本片获第45届戛纳电影节评委会大奖。

　　故事发生在六十年代初期的印尼，盖伊（梅尔·吉布森 Mel Gibson 饰）是被电视台派往此处进行采访调查的记者。彼时，政府在雅加达刚刚成立，国内的情势一片混乱，这让盖伊的采访毫无头绪，一次偶然中，盖伊结识了名为比利（琳达·亨特 Linda Hunt 饰）的记者，比利虽然身材矮小，人脉却四通八达，在比利的帮助下，盖伊开始逐渐接触到了隐藏在这个政府中的某些秘密。
　　在雅加达，盖伊还邂逅了吉尔（西格妮·韦弗 Sigourney Weaver 饰），一位美丽而又勇敢的独立女性，两人之间碰撞出了爱情的火花。雅加达的局势不断的恶化着，比利和盖伊之间的友情亦因为种种矛盾而产生裂痕。

　　男孩Corey决心帮助他的弟弟Jimmy完成前往加洲的心愿，在惊历奇险之后，终于如愿以偿，并且获得一份额外的礼物，参加任天堂电玩游戏的冠军赛。一部青春冒险奇想的电影，交织着温馨感人的气氛。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

Special Reception