威尔（海登·克里斯滕森 Hayden Christensen 饰）是一个成功的华尔街股票经纪人，为了修补他和儿子丹尼（Ty Shelton 饰）的关系，威尔带着自己的家人来到了自己成长的小屋度假。当威尔和丹尼在狩猎时，他们目睹了一起谋杀。好心的威尔把伤者带回了家并且医治了他，可是男子却绑架了丹尼，并要求威尔帮助他们把钱拿回来。而与此同时，警长（布鲁斯·威利斯 Bruce Willis 饰）也对此案十分感兴趣，而威尔的新指令便是帮助劫匪们躲避警长的追查......
When the single middle-aged Luis travels from Barcelona to bury the remains of his mother in the vault of his family in Segovia, he is lodged by his aunt Pilar in her old house where he spent his summer of 1936 with her. He meets his cousin Angelica, who was his first love, living on the first floor with her husband and daughter, and he recalls his childhood in times of the Spanish Civil War entwined with the present.
金哈克曼饰杰森罗德上校，一心追查其在越南战场上失踪的儿子，他数度向美国政府陈情始终石沉大海，罗德绝望之余只好采取自力行动。罗德的苦衷获得德州油亨的资助，召集其子在陆战队服役时五位军中好友，经过数周艰苦的训练之后，七人毅然前往寮国展开一场惊险的营救行动。
日本土耳其合作电影《海难1890》 该片根据真人真事改编，故事发生在1890年9月的日本和歌山县串本町大岛的附近海域，来自土耳其的大使团乘坐的军舰发生沉船事故，船上618人跌入大海，导致五百多人丧生，共有69名幸存者在当地民众的营救下脱险。这一沉船救人事件，至今印刻在土耳其人民的心中。
尼娜和莉兹被送进同一间精神病院，并在此相识。尼娜对父亲的死心怀愧疚，悲惨事件发生以来一直情绪低落。至于莉兹，她是个有点精神错乱的女孩，曾试图自杀，因此被监禁于此。一个周末晚上，莉兹劝服尼娜一起溜出医院，和自己的男朋友以及其他朋友将城市漆成一片红色。然而事情并没有照计划进行……
妮琪塔（安妮·帕里洛德饰）与一群朋友抢劫一家商店的药品，商店的主人与她的朋友都在这次的事件中身亡，妮琪塔则是因为杀了一位警察而被送入狱。此时来了一个神秘的政府组织，选上了妮琪塔，并训练她成为特务杀手，在经过数年的特务训练之后，妮琪塔以一个平凡的护士身份回到现实的生活中，在此时她爱上了一个男人，他们的关系在妮琪塔接到一个特务命令时，面临了紧张的局面...
故事发生在一所大使馆中，在小男孩菲利普（Bobby Henrey 饰）的眼中，管家班尼思（拉尔夫·理查德森 Ralph Richardson 饰）是如假包换的英雄。这其中的原委要追溯到菲利普经常外出的父母身上，父母不在，照顾和看管菲利普的责任自然就落到了班尼思的身上，在菲利普这样一个敏感又单纯的年纪，一个替他打点一切事宜的人就等同于无所不能的英雄。 可班尼思真的如同菲利普所认为的那样正直和勇敢吗？当然不是，他不过是一个再普通不过的成年人罢了。尽管已有家室，但班尼思还是和一个名叫朱莉（米歇尔·摩根 Michèle Morgan 饰）的年轻女子保持着暧昧关系，甚至趁菲利普的父母不在家时偷偷将朱莉带到大使馆幽会。没想到，一次意外夺走了班尼斯夫人的生命，而这一单纯的事故在菲利普看来，却是一场蓄意已久的谋杀。
某五年制高专学校，可爱女孩叶泽里美（长泽雅美 饰）连续一个月旷课，还在制作的机器人上涂鸦。为避免暑期留校补习，她只得遵从机器人部的顾问图师隼人（铃木一真 饰）的安排加入机器人制作组，备战即将到来的机器人竞赛（Robo-Con）。里美所在的小组由天才机器人设计师相田航一（小栗旬 饰）和热情开朗的作战指挥四谷四郎（伊藤淳史 饰）组成，对于这个对机械没有丁点概念的女孩来说，一切都如此陌生，她只得从最简单的机器人操作做起。 不久，超过60所高专参加的机器人竞赛来开序幕。未经充分磨合的小组、设计不够完善的作品，里美难忘的夏天就这样开始了……
本片题材具有强烈的社会意义，改编自约翰尼克尔斯的同名小说，描述新墨西哥州一个名叫乔的技工引入被当地一家土地开发公司所控制的水源来灌溉他那已乾枯的豆田，遭到非法使用的控告，因而引发了一连串乡民向不合理制度和企业强权抗争的冲突事件。
A special sideshow torture exhibit has the power, according to showman Dr. Diablo, to warn people of evil in their futures. As skeptical customers are shown the greed and violence they&♯39;re hiding, one of them snaps and kills Diablo. When they run off, we see the murder to be staged as part of the show. One of the customers has hung around to see this, and wants to make a deal with Diablo, aka the Devil. A very good anthology of tales, written by Robert Bloch and directed by Freddie FRancis, for Amicus, an icon of this kind of movie. The tales are uneven, sure, but they are all at least good, till the perfect final one, the Man who collected Poe, with Jack Palance and Peter Cushing, a great idea, and a marvelous tale to watch. Very good Burgess Meredith as Diabolo the Great, the host for these tales. Unfortunately for us all, this kind of movies are a thing from the past and today we don&♯39;t get any more gems like this. A must see
A young mute woman, living in a small village, is expecting a baby. Her husband is at the same time writing a novel and using the villagers as his characters. In the creative process, reality and imagination are constantly intertwined.
Will Dormer（阿尔·帕西诺 Al Pacino 饰）与搭档Hap Eckhart（马丁·唐文 Martin Donovan 饰）来到远离洛杉矶一处日不落的小镇阿拉斯加，调查一名17岁少女被活活殴打致死的案件。阿拉斯加一名女警察llie Burr（希拉里·斯万克 Hilary Swank 饰）对Dormer的办案手法由衷感到敬畏，努力在查案过程中学习。而此刻的多莫其实已经麻烦缠身，他在洛杉矶抓获了一个案件嫌疑人，因为要将其定罪，不得不捏造了假证据，此事已被内务部调查。Hap想向内务部坦诚真相并认为对Dormer也是好事，不过Dormer不这样想。 在引诱真凶的围捕中，Dormer在大雾中失误打死Hap，Hap临死前认为Dormer是故意打死自己的。在陈述事件时Dormer本能性地说那枪是凶手开的。然而在良心的压力和日不落的环境下，他患上了严重的失眠症。这时有人开始给他打电话，声称看见了雾中的一切。Dormer最后将凶手锁定在侦探小说作家Walter Finch（罗宾·威廉斯 Robin Williams 饰）身上，对方也没打算和他捉迷藏的游戏。 一场心理和良心的对决开始了。
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"? The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
