由成田凌、若叶龙也([在街上])主演的电影[到了黄昏时分](くれなずめ，暂译)发布预告，该片由松居大悟([安昙春子下落不明])执导，高良健吾、滨野谦太(《有喜欢的人》)、藤原季节、前田敦子等联合主演。该片改编自同名舞台剧，讲述了在高中时代的六位同学因朋友的婚宴而在毕业多年后重聚，在参加完婚宴到第二次聚会之间回忆旧时回忆的故事。该片将于4月29日在日本上映。
小青年Rick Steven暗恋着一个叫Nina的女孩，Nina是这个学校最漂亮的女孩。为了赢得他的芳心，他愿意为Nina做任何事情，然后事情并非那么一帆风顺：黑手党，脱衣舞娘，死人事件，到底Rick是否能与Nina修成正果，让我们来一看究竟吧···
金哈克曼饰杰森罗德上校，一心追查其在越南战场上失踪的儿子，他数度向美国政府陈情始终石沉大海，罗德绝望之余只好采取自力行动。罗德的苦衷获得德州油亨的资助，召集其子在陆战队服役时五位军中好友，经过数周艰苦的训练之后，七人毅然前往寮国展开一场惊险的营救行动。
这部电影根据真实事件改编，讲述了加拿大的圣文森特天主教孤儿院，教会神父对十岁的凯文和其他孩子们进行性虐待的故事。这个事件浮出水面后警方开始进行调查，丑闻才得以公布于众，而当地宗教和政治团体却始终保持沉默。
一群人应邀前往恭贺苏格兰的一幢百年鬼屋中亲身体验超自然的神秘力量。结果他们发现屋中的种种怪异状况并非因为鬼魂出现所致，而是跟屋主的历史和房子的环境有很大的关系。本片在一个封闭的空间中拍出紧凑逼人的恐怖气氛，完全不依赖血腥或搞鬼镜头而令人捏一把冷汗，功力过人，两位女主角的 演出亦特别精彩，堪称低成本灵异电影中的代表作。 1999年的《猛鬼屋》是1959年电影《house on haunted hill》的翻拍版，之前的信息有误，希望大家移步另一页面。
影片叙述一个妓女和她的情人寻求拯救他们灵魂的道路，使他们从污泥中的儿女变成太阳下的儿女。当剧中的男主角鼓起勇气在象征邪恶的坏蛋脸上打了一个耳光以后，他们两人终于获得了他们所追求的目的。
东西双方处于针锋相对的奇妙情势。KGB内部有些人为了自己的私利，搞出了一系列的阴谋，首先是科斯柯夫假向西方"投诚"，并道出KGB准备进行一项名为"特务飞龙"的计划，目的是消灭00组的特工，007怀疑其动机，伪装刺杀，并查出科斯柯夫与军火贩子一起用购买军火的货款走私毒品，007得到反政府武装的支持，终于炸毁了毒品，科斯柯夫的计划彻底破产。
Sin Sisters
亚娜（莱娜·克棱克 Lena Klenke 饰）是一名17岁的美丽少女，和其他同龄的女孩子不同，亚娜看上去非常的苍白安静，原来，亚娜患有先天性心脏病，无法从事任何激烈的运动，并且不知道哪一天、哪一个瞬间就会被死神夺走生命。 枯燥乏味的生活让亚娜感到非常的窒息，渐渐丧失了对生活的热情，直到有一天，她看到了纯种马奔跑的场面，这充满了生命力的场景让她的心情久久不能平息，亚娜爱上了赛马这项运动。保罗（迪特·哈勒沃登 Dieter Hallervorden 饰）是一名经验丰富的驯马师，他明白赛马对于亚娜来说有多么的重要，也在亚娜的身上看到了杰出的赛马天赋，可是，赛马是一项非常激烈的竞技运动，亚娜的身体能够负担的了吗？
2012年，荷兰哈伦小镇的一名少女在Facebook上为自己的16岁生日派对创建了一个活动，却错误地将私密派对设置成了公开。受好莱坞电影《X计划》的启发，荷兰青少年们将这个活动迅速传播开来，很快便有成千上万的人报名参加。 尽管警方和当地政府发出警告，但他们仍然认为不会有人来参加。由于没有为抵达哈伦的大量年轻人提供任何招待，派对很快就演变成一场全面的骚乱。
A poor young man finds a magic lamp that possesses a genie, who will grant the boy three wishes if he sets him free from the lamp.
已经年届半百的上班族坂町晴彦（中井贵一 饰），意外迎来了一个想不到的访客——户泽美枝（波瑠 饰）。大学生美枝此时正在甲子园事务局的“Masters甲子园”部门担任志愿者，此外她还是坂町当年高中棒球队的队友松川典夫的亲生女儿。当年松川因卷入伤人事件使坂町他们梦断甲子园，在过去的27年里他每年元旦都会给队友写贺卡，可是从来没有寄出，直到他在上一年死于3·11大地震。美枝恳请坂町能代表川越学院走入甲子园，同时希望更多了解父亲生前的故事。怀着复杂情感的坂町找到了高桥直之（柳叶敏郎 饰）等老队友，而在他们决心为那年夏天的遗憾画上句号的时候，一个隐藏了许久的秘密也悄然浮现…… 本片根据重松清的原作改编。
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"? The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
