稀人

　　影片的主人公是年近30岁的5位年轻人，他们终日游手好闲，热衷于恶作剧并沉溺于梦幻般不切实际的计划里。其中最年长的浮士德让最年少的摩拉德的妹妹桑德拉怀了孕，基于责任心及周围人的力劝而结了婚。浮士德在一家古董店工作，但因为恶习不改企图勾引店主的老婆而被解雇。一天，桑德拉得知浮士德带着一名舞娘到一家廉价的旅馆过夜，于是第二天她带着孩子离家出走；狼狈的浮士德第一次感到桑德拉的重要性。于是和她的兄弟四人拼命寻找桑德拉的下落，终于找到桑德拉的浮士德一边遭到父亲的痛斥；一边恳求桑德拉的原谅。见到二人重修旧好的摩拉德在次日清晨不辞而别，踏上了自己的旅程。

　　洛杉矶警察杰克墨菲（查尔斯.布朗森）这下遇到大麻烦了，之前与他有深仇大恨的敌人竟然残酷地杀死自己的老婆，并试图栽赃给杰克。即使所有人都认为莫非有罪，他还是成功从监狱中逃脱，只为了报复并抓到真正的凶手，说什么也要洗清自己的罪名。

　　1980年法國布列塔尼小鎮，沒有正版黑膠搖滾樂，只有盜版自錄混音帶。菲利浦與哥哥一起經營地下電台，充滿自信的哥哥擔任電台主持，談起搖滾口才流利，受到眾人矚目；擁有混音天份的菲利浦只能位居幕後，沉默寡言又邊緣。兵役將近，活在哥哥光環底下的菲利浦焦急地想完成自己的混音作品，直到前往柏林當兵，他才逐漸意識到，被環境困住的原來不只是自己。
　　設定在搖滾樂的黃金年代、柏林圍牆倒塌前夕，新銳導演文森邁爾卡多納透過主角呢喃的旁白，搭配鮮活的攝影與剪輯，以及歡樂分隊、伊吉帕普等多首搖滾金曲，構築出一部充滿浪漫懷舊情調、青春又惆悵的成長電影。少年情懷總是詩，說不出口的那些、對未來的迷惘與期待，全寄語在磁帶裡，混成一軌屬於年輕世代的搖滾篇章。

　　An American novelist living for a time in London converses with his wife, his mistress, and other female characters he may have dreamed up.

　　德国小镇，面目狰狞的卡里加里博士（沃纳·克劳斯 Werner Krauss饰）终于获准表演催眠术。大学生弗朗西斯（弗里德里希·费赫尔 Friedrich Feher饰）和艾伦（汉斯·海因里希 Hans Heinrich von Twardowski饰）也来观看。疯狂的卡里加里博士向众人展示他是如何催眠和控制他的搭档凯撒（康拉德·韦特 Conrad Veidt饰），并向众人宣布：凯撒可以回答大家提出的所有问题。好奇的艾伦问道：我能活多久？病态的凯撒回答：活到明天凌晨。弗朗西斯并不相信，可艾伦却是满脸惊恐。随之，艾伦真的被杀害了。弗朗西斯把消息告诉了好朋友珍妮（丽尔·达戈沃 Lil Dagover饰）和她的医生父亲。他们展开了多方追捕，可惊人的秘密却丝丝入扣，到底谁才是真正的凶手？
　　本片是世界电影史上被谈论得最多的影片之一，是德国表现主义电影的里程碑之作。影片以其怪诞的表现主义风格，成为以后西方恐怖片为之效仿的鼻祖。1958年本片在比利时布鲁塞尔由26个国家117位电影史家评选为“世界电影12佳作”的第12名。

　　日本战国时代末期，有个名叫池坊专好的怪人。他爱花如命，是京都顶法寺六角堂的花僧，也是远近闻名的花道大师。
　　经他拨弄过的松木，一举征服了岐阜城城主织田信长，丰臣秀吉、千利休亦为他的花道技艺倾倒。
　　他不善言辞，时常记不住人名，同秀吉、利休等名流往来甚密，却毫无攀炎附势之心。妙手生花是他唯一的乐趣与追求。
　　时过境迁，痛失爱子鹤松的秀吉变得残暴无度，不但肃清政治异己，连私底下吐露怨言的无辜百姓也要残酷清算。终于，平民百姓，甚至是好友利休，都被逼上了绝路。为了守护他们，还大家一个和平的天下，专好向万人之上的秀吉发起了一个前所未有的挑战。而他拿来当武器的，不是刀刃，而是花……

 暴风雨中，3名女子学校的学生被困在地下坑里，他们必须直面各自的内心冲突，奋力求生。

　　梅多斯小姐（凯蒂·霍姆斯饰）是个温柔而规规矩矩的普通小学教师，其完美的仪态和漂亮的印花连衣裙下却隐藏着一个不为人知的秘密——在没有教学任务或打理她的花园之外，她竟作为一个持枪维持治安的私刑独行侠。可是，在与小镇警长（詹姆斯·巴奇·戴尔饰）步入浪漫之后，她开始纠结......

　　亮（吉冈秀隆饰）与家里的父亲发生了冲突，离家旅行到一个小镇，遇到了一家影院的经理活男（西田敏行饰），并留了下来工作，在影院工作的还有放映师常先生（田中邦卫饰），并认识了开咖啡店的八重子（田中裕子饰）。活男一直喜欢八重子，可惜后来终未能如愿，八重子离开了小镇。

　　一群恐怖分子占领了一家电视台，并用一种致命的病毒劫持了整个城市，恐怖分子释放病毒时，它会在电视台室内制造出一支不死僵尸怪物大军，现在逃生必须用枪、刀、拳头与恐怖分子和不死僵尸作战，并以防止全球爆发活尸怪物大军。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　Desdemona lives on an isolated island with her strange family: her father Mario, her stepmother Dulcinea and her mentally challenged sister Paulova. As the only inhabitants on the island loneliness and desolation engulf all members of her family. Desdemona tries to ward off her boredom by taking long walks along the beach or engaging in acts of self-gratification. She often tries to seduce her own father Mario to engage in acts of a sexual nature. Their daily routine is interrupted by the arrival (by boat) of a robust male stranger who brings friction into Desdemona&♯39;s family.