入侵隐私

　　故事发生在某知名企业，以收到的一封电子邮件拉开序幕。这封电子邮件将会从根本上威胁到企业的生存，好不容易才查出了警视厅公安部的一个警部与这家企业有着密切的关系，但是，特别监察官却企图竭力隐藏可供查明真相的线索。为了调查案件真相而被提拔的，是即将被革职查办的白州胜彦(椎名桔平饰)和秋吉宗贵(窪塚洋介饰)二人。
　　专门调查警察组织内部犯罪的特别监察官室，对某个危险人物进行了调查。他就是警视厅公安部警部的石卷修次。由于他与大型胶片制造商——DAITO公司相勾结，并且与中国黑社会组织的关系等等，一直令人怀疑，说不定哪天就会引发足以导致警察机构崩溃的爆炸性新闻。
　　为了掌握石卷的动向，警察厅特别监察官室长——御代田警视正，决定起用二个将被革职查办的警探对警察组织内部进行调查。这两个警探就是白州胜彦和秋吉宗贵。白州胜彦——在毒品交易现场射杀嫌疑犯后，拿走作为证据的现金。秋吉宗贵——有女装癖，在警视厅盗窃女警制服。
　　与此同时，DAITO公司本部收到了一封奇怪的电子邮件恐吓信，送信者署名“溺水的鱼”。电子邮件上宣称：如果不能满足信里的要求，不但DAITO公司本部，就连其设在东京都内的DPE照相馆也将受到毁灭性的打击。虽然这样的要求让人感到不可思议，但是这种威胁根本无法判断其真伪。DAITO的四个照相馆的显影液箱里都被掺入了漂白剂，顾客的胶卷也因此全部报废了。罪犯的手段虽然周到、完善，但又不同于一般的恐吓企业犯罪。“溺水的鱼”的目标并非是金钱，而是指名要求DAITO公司的管理层高级职员，到来往行人众多的地方，自己进行有损自己尊严的行为。鉴于这些高级职员们的爱社精神，他们不得不流着泪、可怜兮兮地在众人面前一个个地活活丢丑……
　　某个星期五的夜晚，石卷在富有才气的图像艺术家——冈部哲晃所经营的俱乐部举办的特色娱乐活动“同性恋之夜”上露面了。为了潜入调查，不太情愿的白州和略显几分兴奋的秋吉假扮成一对同性恋情侣，混进了这个狂热而令人窒息的俱乐部……
　　意外的悬念一个接一个地明朗化了，白天展开了激烈的枪战，白州和秋吉潜入了混杂着各种人物、各种欲望的大都市黑社会组织中，在他们面前发生了令人震撼的事件……

Soundproof Suburban Inn

　　John Dillinger and his gang go on a bank robbing spree across the midwest, but one G-Man is determined to bring him down

　　十二岁的阿曼达是一名游泳运动员。她非常安静而又内向，着迷于游泳，因为她在水下全然的私密空间中找到了独一无二的安全感。阿曼达没有父母关心，于是把大部分时间都泡在游泳池里，不断训练。也许游泳是她唯一一件真正喜欢做的事，她想要做好，想要成功。普莉希拉是游泳队里的明星，现在却成 为了阿曼达的对手。她们之间的较量从泳池拓展到了生活中的方方面面，一场微妙的角力就此拉开序幕。

 暴风雨中，3名女子学校的学生被困在地下坑里，他们必须直面各自的内心冲突，奋力求生。

　　A young mute woman, living in a small village, is expecting a baby. Her husband is at the same time writing a novel and using the villagers as his characters. In the creative process, reality and imagination are constantly intertwined.

　　杰安是装修公司的项目经理，他接到一个任务，必须在七周之内将意大利海滨的一家破旧旅馆修好。面对同行的竞争，杰安一筹莫展。此时一名当地关系广泛的妇女玛丽娅提出帮助，但条件是杰安必须假冒她的未婚夫，这样，她就能避免嫁给一名恶棍。杰安不情愿地同意了，但没料到他的女友苏珊突然到来，杰安不得不在两名女人之间周旋……

　　亮（吉冈秀隆饰）与家里的父亲发生了冲突，离家旅行到一个小镇，遇到了一家影院的经理活男（西田敏行饰），并留了下来工作，在影院工作的还有放映师常先生（田中邦卫饰），并认识了开咖啡店的八重子（田中裕子饰）。活男一直喜欢八重子，可惜后来终未能如愿，八重子离开了小镇。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　An old friend of a private detective is murdered. The detective, Mike Hammer, will make every effort to find out the killer. At each step he does, there is someone taking advantage of his progress.  Written by Luis Carvacho {lcarvach@lascar.puc.cl}

　　人在死亡之前，这一生会在眼前快转而过；《追忆似水年华》是濒死之际，追忆此生的一切。 随著意识流动，看著照片想起与此人相关的往事，又从往事中的一个细微动作/物品，回忆到与其相关的其它过往，如此再三地自由联想，便复杂交错地勾勒出了主角马塞尔的一生。
　　
　　要以短短的2个小时又40分钟的影片，呈现《追忆似水年华》这部原著钜作的所有，无疑是缘木求鱼，因此导演聪明地抓住原著中意识流之感，让观众一如进入梦境般，随著马塞尔的思绪跃动，反覆穿梭在马塞尔漫漫一生的各个经验翦影中，感受到回忆之玄妙，却也让人容易在其中迷了路。
　　
　　片中不时出现超现实的场景转换，如马塞尔坐在椅子上，新闻电影银幕之前滑动；马塞尔在街道上走到一半突然滑跤，在身体前扑之际静止，然后背景不断转换，接著他滑到了下一个场景；或者进入一个雕像错落的异空间，观众恍如置身梦境，也充分表达了「追忆」这件事，其实与「做梦」极为相似。而片中不断出现的静止画面、雕像意像，更表达了止凝吉光片影，紧握回忆的企图。
　　
　　在追忆之时，也不免对「回忆」提出辩证：「如果遗忘所带来的回忆，不再与当下有任何联系，就能让我们瞬时体验新的气象，其实，我们早已体验过这些了……每一次类比的浮想，总将我带离现在……」
　　
　　片尾也以雕刻师萨维尼的故事表达了「永恒」的意念，只要曾发生过，便是永恒，它不会消失，只是不再回来，因此能鲜活地历历在心。