纳粹时代结束十二年后，大多数公民还在纳粹政权的恐怖阴影中。总检察长弗里茨·鲍尔一直致力于纳粹罪行的举报。根据1957年的线索，他找到了前党卫军阿道夫·艾希曼的下落，鲍尔希望将艾希曼绳之以法。但他反复受阻，高级检察官乌尔里希和BKA员工保罗·格布哈特破坏鲍尔的进程……
一名波士顿警探调查了一系列令人毛骨悚然的、由一名戴着黑皮衣的连环杀手组成的大学校园里，他怀疑一位著名的人类学教授和他的女同住的助手。
《我是你的眼》改编自法国畅销小说《点字之心》，备受瞩目的法国古典音乐美少女亚莉克·丝薇洛特跨界领衔，以自身经验完美诠释主人翁的精湛琴艺，以及备受瞩目的法国超萌新星尚史丹杜巴克（Jean-Stan Du Pac），并集结法国凯萨奖男星帕斯卡艾勒柏（Pascal Elbe）《夏日时光》男星查尔斯贝林（Charles Berling）等实力派演员，是继《贝利叶一家》后，法国影坛2017年最新的感人力作。
Dracula is resurrected, preying on four unsuspecting visitors to his castle.
在一次登山运动中，彼得的父亲为了让他成功获救，毅然选择割断绳索，坠崖身亡。由于内心的痛苦阴影，彼得（克里斯·奥唐纳饰）放弃了登山事业，并由此与同是登山运动员的妹妹不欢而散。 妹妹在有一次挑战喜马拉雅山脉西麓高耸入云的K2峰时遇险，全队困在高峰上的岩洞里。由于食物与药物的紧缺，他们的生命岌岌可危。为了营救妹妹，彼得不惜生命危险，再次登上喜马拉雅山，展开与时间的竞赛和对自然极限的挑战。
出生于韩国的弗雷迪，自少便被领养家庭带到法国生活。25岁那年原本要去东京旅行，却因遇上台风而转游首尔，继而开展了一段寻根之旅。在法国成长的她，与亲生父母有着全然不同的文化，使这趟突如其来的旅程引发出更深层的身份思考，也将她的人生引领至始料未及的方向。
After his father&♯39;s death, the unemployed Aman returns to Kuala Lumpur and embarks illegally on a ride-hailing service, as he fails to obtain a driving license due to his color blindness. When his landlord chases him out of his rental accommodation, he ends up sleeping in his car. A chance encounter with Bella, a Chinese &♯39;escort girl&♯39;, grants Aman a temporary residence at her place. In return, she asks Aman to become her driver. As they become closer, Bella confides in Aman about her intention to leave Malaysia. Complications ensue when Bella finds herself pregnant and decides to have an abortion.
故事讲述一名记者，为融入上流社会，不惜趋炎附势，放弃尊严，看尽名人百态的他，最后也只落得一场空。
墨西哥城高檔酒店內，年輕女傭自有心事。日復一日的漫長工作，總有打掃不盡的房間。她長途跋涉上班，無法照料年幼兒子，卻要幫客人看顧小孩。參加進修班，望能晉升到尊貴樓層。偶然拾獲紅裙，盼失物無人認領可據為己有。抹窗工人隔窗傳情，她其實更需要找到女性自我的聲音。來自劇場的阿維萊絲首拍長片即備受注目，以紀實眼光看打工女的生活與生存，發掘角色沉靜外表下的豐富情感，暗暗接通戴丹兄弟和艾方素卡朗的《羅馬》（2018）。
2012年，荷兰哈伦小镇的一名少女在Facebook上为自己的16岁生日派对创建了一个活动，却错误地将私密派对设置成了公开。受好莱坞电影《X计划》的启发，荷兰青少年们将这个活动迅速传播开来，很快便有成千上万的人报名参加。 尽管警方和当地政府发出警告，但他们仍然认为不会有人来参加。由于没有为抵达哈伦的大量年轻人提供任何招待，派对很快就演变成一场全面的骚乱。
Powerful contemporary drama. A young woman falls in love with the wrong man, with tragic consequences for everyone.
Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"? The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski) From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
