平安夜杀人夜

　　德国移民的名导演埃里克．冯．施特罗海姆花费了一百三十万美元和十一个月的时间摄制而成的超级文艺片，原拷贝长达五小时，公开上映时浓缩成三小时半。由于耗资惊人，好莱坞大亨本来对埃里克颇有微词，后因本片获得意外的卖座成功而作罢。故事以1919年的蒙地卡罗为背景。埃里克扮演一个欺骗美国外交官女儿的白俄亲王，靠着剥削他的情妇----一个貌丑的女仆为生。由于性虐待狂的驱使，他强奸了一个不幸的白痴女子。最后，他被人杀死，他的尸首很有象征意义地被扔在臭水沟里。埃里克对自然主义情有独钟，希望把一切情史都在画面中表现出来。他特地在加州海边搭建起蒙地卡罗的赌场和雄伟宫殿的布景，并且在采光上有十分大胆的处理方式。影像上也富于感官刺激的煽情暴力场面，甚至劳烦电检单位剪掉了其中的一些镜头。在片中，埃里克用一种辛酸的悲观主义眼光来观察人类，对上层社会的腐朽和封建作出激烈的抨击，流露出一种愤而感伤的怜悯色彩。而对低下层的人物和被骗上当的女子，则寄予同情的关注，表现出独特的“埃里克式人道主义精神"。

　　轮椅上的乔纳森一直由保姆贝兹照顾,贝兹突然心脏病发,一直疏于照顾弟弟的哥哥克里斯托弗亲自照顾弟弟.兄弟两人多年隔阂,相处并不融洽.妮娜是克里斯托弗唱片公司的新职员,恰巧刚搬到乔纳森家旁成为了邻居.乔纳森对妮娜一见钟情,公司内,克里斯托弗也对妮娜大献殷勤.歌手罗宾因对歌词不满,唱片迟迟未能推出,乔纳森无意间听到罗宾的曲子,为其添词.克里斯托弗将歌词拿到公司,公司震惊,但大家都以为歌词为克里斯托弗所写.妮娜也被歌词所感动,接受了克里斯托弗.乔纳森知道自己的歌词被人误会为克里斯托弗所写,并知道妮娜与克里斯托弗走在了一起,倍受打击.最终妮娜知道了真相,勇敢的表达了内心的真实情感.

想生孩子的加奈子（Kanako）迎接排卵日。 她向丈夫求婚，但遭到拒绝。 与丈夫再婚后，加奈子对他的冷漠不满意。 在白天，她在厨房里自慰，继子厚实看到了它。 当厚史停止观看加奈子自慰时，她本能地兴奋了。 他试图找到异性，但陷入了加奈子的大胆行动。 淳史几乎没有平静下来，在房间里睡着了。 但是与他无关的加奈子 他进入厚史的房间，开始触摸他的阴茎。 然后，他兴奋地说他需要精子。 涉足加奈子的厚史征服了她的身体。

　　寅次郎回来通知家人，打算跟他途中相识的单亲妈妈娟代订婚。当娟代失踪已久的丈夫再次出现后，寅次郎留下短信就离开了。在旅途中，寅次郎在津和野重遇旧相识歌子，而她的丈夫刚病逝。基于责任，她与夫家苛刻的父母一起生活。寅次郎劝说歌子来东京，并陪同她去见因反对婚事而对歌子疏远的作家父亲。寅次郎希望与歌子有所发展的意图落空，因歌子决定要奉献她的生命给弱智儿童。

　　面对岁月挑战的老猎手，和自己收养的狐狸一起，彼此都成全了彼此的追逐。没有任何一部描写人与动物关系的影片具有如此的震撼力。

　　在深邃的太空中，一个宇航员回望地球，回忆起自己童年的时光，于是时间回到1946年。哈萨克斯坦的一个小镇上，很多人都喜欢养鸽子。这天，有一只从遥远的地方飞来的白鸽引起众人的目光，万尼亚把这只鸽子抓住了，立即招徕众人的嫉妒和仇恨。后来，鸽子还是被偷走了，万尼亚不忍心让这只白鸽成为灵魂阴暗的人的牺牲品，拼了命也要把鸽子找回来，终于白鸽重新回到了蓝天。

　　一次出诊中，包法利医生（让-弗朗索瓦·巴尔梅 Jean-François Balmer）和年轻的女孩艾玛（伊莎贝尔·于佩尔 Isabelle Huppert 饰）相遇了，艾玛的纯情和美丽让医生迅速坠入了情网，两人随即结婚。婚后的生活并不如艾玛所幻想的那样充满了乐趣和激情，是帅气的雷翁（卢卡斯·贝尔沃克斯 Lucas Belvaux 饰）的出现让艾玛重新快乐了起来，但他的离开带来的则是更深的痛苦和绝望。富豪鲁道夫（克里斯托弗·马拉沃伊 Christophe Malavoy 饰）贪恋艾玛的美色，给予了她诸多的空洞承诺，而为了配得上鲁道夫，艾玛不惜赊账购入首饰与华服。在约定好私奔的那一天，鲁道夫失约了，大受打击的艾玛一病不起。
　　在丈夫的照料下，艾玛渐渐康复，在一场音乐会上，她与雷翁重逢了，与后者打的火热的日子里，艾玛丝毫没有察觉自己早已债台高筑。而当催债的传票出现在眼前时，被所有男人抛弃的艾玛选择了死亡。

　　Kim Dong - sik, a securities company employee, feels an inferiority when his wife &♯39;s business succeeds, and her position in the home becomes blurred and gradually wanders. With this escape from wandering, the hostess will have extramarital affairs. Then, when his character is indecisive, he will have another home with this guidance, and will fall into deeper conflicts and abyss. The wife and the wife of the family share a certain kind of negotiation through the realism of the woman. In the end, he tried to escape from reality and wanted to flee his own pit himself and be forever forgotten by all.

Sin Sisters

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

 濒临破产的遛狗师沃克，为摆脱经济困境，接下富豪客户道格在偏远庄园的特殊遛狗工作。他发现，这份工作的对象并非普通宠物，而是一个以犬类身份完全生活的男人。尽管初时不适，沃克仍为高薪妥协，却逐渐在扭曲的主从关系中，被步步侵蚀身份、控制感与人性边界，在生存压力与自我认同的拉扯中，陷入无法挣脱的诡异漩涡。

　　Since 1977, Sam Klemke has been recording himself on film, the ♯selfieavantlalettre. In that same year, NASA launched the Voyager with the Golden Record. Whereas NASA primarily sketches a positive picture of humanity, Klemke&♯39;s honest self portraits zoom in on the individual. A special film about time, memory and what it means to be human.
　　‘This year will be my year, it has to be!’ Since 1977, Sam Klemke - a pioneer status updater - has looked back on ‘his year’ using video. With the illusion of progress, he hopes to encourage ‘personal growth and improvement’.
　　Documentary maker Matthew Bate met Klemke on Facebook and became acquainted with his video 35 Years Back Through Time, a super-cut in which Klemke counts backwards from 2011 to his ambitious teenage self. Intrigued by this obsessive film project, Bate used Klemke&♯39;s personal archive to create a documentary collage that feels like an intimate road trip, with Klemke providing valuable lessons about time. Along the way, he dismantles the dream of success and happiness. Klemke&♯39;s self-mockery and honesty give the whole thing a light, breezy feel.
　　Through this, Bate interweaves NASA’s Golden Record Project which, just like Klemke’s video project, was launched in 1977. This juxtaposition creates a reflection in which Bate sketches the comprehension of time and self-documenting stories as an inherent human need.